Global Jurisdiction
United Nations Statute
Globocean Constitution
NORSID CASE: Notorious Repeated Systemic Institutionalized Damages.

JUDGMENT: inclusion of judgments available for open certified judges and jury citizens using email jusistem (at) jusistem.com; Global Order to Stop/Repair Damage; notorious repetitive systemic evidence of damages.
Global Order to Stop/Repair Damage served to national/international judicial systems to be locally and internationally enforced, directly and immediately or by opening a local/international judicial process to be concluded in no longer than one year.

Freedom of expression includes freedom of accusation and defense, where the accused is protected by society with presumption of innocence until proven guilty, with no damage possible, as alleged in subjective primitive concepts as honor, moral or good customs, in primitive laws and lawsuits of slander, defamation or insult, where the main reason for suing is usually to threat, blackmail, defame/slander/insult accusers, other victims, informants, witnesses, journalists, justice agents, seeking to invert justice process to them.

Anything can be said at least once without knowledge of alleged damage, without generating an objective damage, as society accepts it as freedom of expression, twice it can turn a caution/alert sign, third time the accuser must be informed of the alleged subjective damage, need for it to be specified and right for defense to be allowed. Fourth time or earlier, the citizen may seek assistance of a judicial agent that will request accuser to qualify/specify/objectify damage of accusation and will allow the accused to introduce a defense for the records and also specify alleged damaged suffered from repetitive unqualified/unspecified accusation.

To establish objective damage, a citizen that feels subjectively damaged by accusations in any verbal style, technical, formal or informal, must inform the accuser of alleged damage and need to establish objective formal accusation or to seek assistance of a justice agent that then would inform the accuser that then would have the opportunity to stop or objectify, formalize, qualify the accusation with assistance if needed of a judicial agent.

Only if accuser fails to specify/qualify/objectify damage accusation can a judicial agent request accuser to silence if an objective damage is established by accused, and only if the accuser continues with general, unqualified, unspecified accusations, and only if an objetive damage has been proven can a judicial agent determine restitution, fine and freedom restriction, at most home arrest with restriction of communication.

All accusers and judges that requested and imposed compensation for slander, defamation, insult for a one to three times alleged damage, have caused damage to freedom of expression and must return the compensation to accused, which must be allowed the opportunity to specify accusation, record defense and evaluate if any objective damage has resulted. No damage can be alleged from this process, since the accused is protected by presumption of innocence.

If premeditated and systemic compensation is given for alleged slander, insult and defamation as a means to oppress/retaliate against accusers, critics, informants, witnesses, accusers, judicial agents, the compensation given must be accompanied by a fine of up to ten times the compensation imposed against them, with danger from serial premeditated damages being restriction of freedom, at most home arrest with restriction of communication.

Profiles with fake followers/traffic to promote itself and/or fake news/attacks and/or web sites promoted/excluded from or positively/negatively promoted search engine research seek to limit/violate freedom of expression usually for power and/or profit motivation. Damages can be estimated and who caused/suffered the damage can be identified for restitution. Social media independent statistics show real/fake profiles/traffic demoted/promoted artificially/non-paid/secretly by media/user in self-interest to cause refundable class action damages and JATO, Judicial Administrative Take Over, removing damage causing controlling shareholders.

Premeditated, repetitive damaging action, specially after knowing of damage and asked to stop is damaging/false propaganda and/or harassment, outside the scope of freedom of expression, involving a social and/or judicial process. But a specific accusation in any shape or form does not cause damage, because the accused is protected by presumption of innocence and right to defense, including public response in the proportion of a public accusation.

Judges failing to protect 1-3 time freedom of speech and protecting over 3 times damaging propaganda/harassment, engaging in a political bias towards ideas/culture similar to their own, are causing damage. They must reimburse and be fined up to ten times the damage they ordered to pay or that they failed to reimburse, given their specific knowledge of law or of damage assessment, demonstrating unique malice, intent to cause damage to citizens with ideas different from their own or who have received advantages of any kind from other citizens with interest in their decision.

ACCUSATION: inclusion of accusation available for certified prosecutors and any citizen using email jusistem (at) jusistem.com; Notorious Repeated Systemic Institutionalized Damages.

Freedom of expression is damaged by citizens/judges alleging slander, insult or defamation, for personal/political censorship, oppression of 1-3 time, relative low potential damage, psychological, subjective events, when accused is protected by presumption of innocence until proven guilty and by the right of defense.

Common in authoritarian/corrupt/abusive regimes trying to silence/oppress opposition, criticism and justice, including informants, accusers, witnesses and judicial agents, that are retaliated/threatened by accused and their defenders, trying to avoid a specific defense for a specific accusation, with general denials, retaliation and threats as with slander, defamation, insult lawsuits that may generate economic/freedom damage to wrongfully accused and wrongfull verdict.

Internet social and research media have and are being used in a damaging fraudulent and/or oppressive/censorship premeditated way, with political and profit motives of users and providers.
Fake news/profiles/trolls and research engine promotion or demotion are examples. In this case a systemic, premeditated, repetitive action can be classified as damaging/false propaganda and/or harassment, outside the scope of freedom of expression.

DEFENSE: inclusion of defenses available for accused, certified defenders and any citizen using email jusistem (at) jusistem.com.

Laws protect honor and good customs from moral damages caused by slander, insult and defamation. Judges are applying the law until it is changed. Freedom of expression has the limit of not causing damage to others. There cannot be previous censorship, but there should be post responsibility.
Judicial Administration Take Overs